Skip to main content

European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). SPAIN

On October 29, 2024, Valencia, Spain received the equivalent of an entire year's worth of rain in just eight hours. This phenomenon, locally known as Depresión Aislada en Niveles Altos (DANA), caused the death of 231 civilians of different nationalities.

This event was reported by international media, and many governments sent their solidarity to the people of Valencia, including Argentina, Brazil, Chile, China, Cuba, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Mexico, the United Kingdom, Ukraine, and Uruguay. They posted their best wishes on social media. What about the United States Democrats?

The Spanish Crisis Committee publicly rejected international aid, not responding to offers of collaboration from:


  • President Nayib Bukele of El Salvador, who offered 300 paramedics and 20 tons of supplies.
  • President Javier Milei of Argentina, who proposed sending an emergency volunteer team called "Cascos Blancos."
  • French Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau, who allegedly offered firefighters.
  • The governments of Morocco, Portugal, Venezuela, and Equatorial Guinea also offered their help.


The government ignored meteorological warnings from AEMET (State Meteorological Agency).


On October 23, 2024, AEMET began reporting on the possibility of a DANA. It was rejected.


On October 29 at 07:36 hours, AEMET issued a red alert (the highest level) for heavy rainfall in the interior of Valencia, and in areas of the autonomous communities of Aragón, Castilla-La Mancha, Andalucía, and Cataluña. This was also rejected.


The affected communities and witnesses to the tragedy blame the Spanish government for the following crimes:


  • Manslaughter due to negligence (Art. 142 of the Penal Code): Authorities failed to issue a preventive warning, leading to the deaths of people.
  • Disinformation (Art. 216 Penal Code): The government concealed information about the number of victims and the extent of the damage.
  • Failure to Provide Assistance (Art. 196 Penal Code): Lack of coordination and delays in rescue efforts put more people in danger without receiving the necessary help.
  • Administrative Responsibility (Law 40/2015 on Legal Regime of Administrative Control): Evidence of negligence by local authorities contributed to the collapse and worsened the situation.
  • Malfeasance (Art. 404 Penal Code): During the administration, authorities made arbitrary decisions, such as failing to activate rescue protocols or misdirecting resources. The President of the Government publicly stated, "IF YOU NEED HELP, ASK FOR IT." This was the first threat to the citizens for expressing the reality of the situation.


These crimes reflect a high degree of negligence and incompetence by the authorities of a European country. They challenge various legal norms of the European Union and present an international defiant stance, showing that Spain is above the law. Despite all this, European justice is too slow, but its response will be decisive.

Justice will Be Done.

Popular posts from this blog

THE CULTURAL FILM FOUNDATION AND THE MEDIA AGENCY WILL BE AUDITED FOR MISAPPROPRIATION OF PUBLIC FUNDS

Foundations are part of the cultural film promotion ecosystem, but they have currently corrupted their social purpose by engaging in fraud against public funds and influence peddling, which demands the immediate termination of their participation in the system of state benefits. Due to these facts, controls and audits will be established to evaluate the destination of those funds, preventing their diversion, triangulation, or misappropriation. THIS DECEPTIVE SCHEME IS UNDER JUDICIAL REVIEW. PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE ARRANGEMENT: MEDIA AGENCY – FOUNDATIONS DETAILS OF THE DECEPTIVE MECHANISM DECEPTIVE MECHANISM “THE FOUNDATIONS”: The project is managed by a Media Agency, which acquires the rights to a book, selects the director and the actors. All other resources such as sets and cameras are obtained free of charge through the Foundation. The State does not usually provide direct cash, but rather tax credits (tax rebates) ranging from 20% to 30% of the expenditure. THE SCHEME: A TOTAL BUDG...
Read more

CREATIVE CONTENT SURPASSES TELEVISION

THIS ARTICLE IS A STANDARD LAW Summary : The more content that is generated, the more regulations will arise, as societies evolve and create their own content every day. Users are no longer passive spectators; today they own and manage their own communication channels, reaching billions of views and surpassing television. Today, television content is based on “ideological trends” that attempt to impose a structural transformation of entertainment. Entertainment is not a political party. Politics belongs on news channels. For this reason, the U.S. legal framework will evolve toward “content neutrality.” The Supreme Court will not be able to apply First Amendment doctrine, because sanctions will not be imposed on “expression” itself, but rather on breaches of contract and algorithmic transparency. WHAT ARTICLES WOULD THIS LAW IMPLEMENT? Creation of the Office of Cultural and Entertainment Integrity (OICE). It is structured as an Independent Regulatory Agency. The bill will be introduced ...
Read more

SOCIAL MEDIA HAS NO MORAL AUTHORITY TO WRONGLY LABEL THE PROFILES OF "SEXUALIZED" YOUNG PEOPLE. THE APOLOGY IS TOO LATE

RESEARCH REPORT LEGISLATIVE DOCUMENT:  BILL PROPOSAL   To understand the debate surrounding this major commercial fraud, it is important to understand the context of the issue from the perspective of a financial investigation. The Infrastructure is Paid for by The User. The problem: A parent, in order for their children to have a decent education like the rest of their community, is nowadays obligated to purchase internet service. Having internet at home has become an additional service tied to cable television. The cost of this home internet service is approximately 30 dollars (with variations ranging from 25 dollars in Latin American countries to 55 dollars in the United States and Europe). In addition to this, every user who registers on a social network consumes phone data when they are out in the street. That specific expense for data plans is approximately 7 dollars per month. All of this adds up to an approximate expense of 60 dollars, which is added to the total cost o...
Read more